Feasibility and perioperative outcomes of Senhance-assisted robotic cholecystectomy: a single-arm meta-analysis.

J Robot SurgOct 9, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchGeneral SurgeryOpen access

Ye Tao, Wen-Tao Lei, Xin-Min Niu et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This single-arm meta-analysis pooled perioperative outcomes from eight studies of Senhance-assisted robotic cholecystectomy, comprising 198 patients. Pooled operative time was 81.48 min (95% CI: 78.52 to 84.44), and the pooled surgical success rate was 96% (95% CI: 90% to 99%). Console time was 39.35 min, docking time 11.54 min, and hospital stay 1.89 days. The findings support feasibility, but the analysis had no comparator group; the authors call for prospective, multicenter comparative studies to clarify the platform’s role.

Key findings

  • Across 198 patients, pooled operative time was 81.48 min (95% CI: 78.52 to 84.44; I² = 0.0%).
  • The pooled surgical success rate was 96% (95% CI: 90% to 99%; I² = 50.7%).
  • Pooled console time was 39.35 min (95% CI: 33.29 to 45.41; I² = 90.0%), and docking time was 11.54 min (95% CI: 8.37 to 14.70; I² = 96.2%).
  • Pooled hospital stay was 1.89 days (95% CI: 0.81 to 2.97; I² = 97.9%); sensitivity analysis found it was influenced by one study.

Why it matters

The pooled results provide an initial quantitative picture of operative and perioperative outcomes with this robotic platform. The high pooled success rate and reported operative times may inform assessment of feasibility, while substantial heterogeneity in docking time and hospital stay cautions against assuming consistent performance across settings. Comparative evidence is needed to establish how outcomes relate to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

What to keep in mind

This single-arm synthesis had no comparator group and included only eight studies and 198 patients. Heterogeneity was high for console time, docking time, and hospital stay; the hospital-stay estimate was sensitive to one study.

Source

Published in J Robot Surg. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in General Surgery

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.