The utility of magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord in paediatric transverse myelitis: A systematic review.

Mult Scler Relat DisordOct 5, 2026 (epub)

Chiraag Thakrar Karia, Paul Koroma, Solomon Nelson-Ashley et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review assessed spinal cord MRI findings, agreement with CSF inflammation, and prognostic associations in children with monophasic acute transverse myelitis. Twelve observational studies included 330 children. The pooled MRI diagnostic yield was 97.6% (95% CI 92.2 to 100.0%), although results varied substantially across studies (I²=71.8%; 95% prediction interval 71.2 to 99.6%). MRI and CSF findings were discordant in 36% of patients with paired data, and baseline MRI positivity did not reliably predict clinical outcome.

Key findings

  • Pooled spinal cord MRI diagnostic yield was 97.6% (95% CI 92.2 to 100.0%), with substantial heterogeneity (I²=71.8%).
  • Among 61 patients with paired data, MRI and CSF findings were discordant in 36%, most often with MRI-positive findings and normal CSF.
  • Of 237 patients with follow-up data, 64% achieved good recovery and 30% had severe residual deficits; persistent bladder dysfunction occurred in 31%.
  • Baseline MRI positivity did not reliably predict outcome.

Why it matters

The review supports MRI as a frequently positive investigation in children with clinically diagnosed acute transverse myelitis, while showing that a normal CSF result may not align with imaging. The wide prediction interval and study heterogeneity caution against treating the pooled yield as universal. MRI findings alone also appear insufficient for prognostic stratification.

What to keep in mind

MRI was required for cohort inclusion in most studies, potentially influencing the estimated diagnostic yield. The pooled result was heterogeneous, and paired MRI-CSF data were available for only 61 patients.

Source

Published in Mult Scler Relat Disord. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Radiology (Diagnostic)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.