Next-generation pharmacological strategies for Parkinson's disease: a systematic literature review of symptom management and disease modification.

Neurol SciOct 12, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchNeurologyOpen access

Rajan Rajabalaya, Arul Kiruba N Mary, Dinesh Kumar Chellappan et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This PRISMA 2020 systematic literature review assessed pharmacological and emerging therapeutic strategies for symptom management and disease modification in Parkinson disease. It included 30 eligible human studies published from 2015–2026, spanning randomised studies, observational research and early clinical trials. Dopaminergic treatment remained central to motor symptom management, while gene-based approaches, stem-cell strategies, nanomedicine, repurposed drugs and AI-supported precision medicine showed potential for neuroprotection or disease modification. However, many approaches remain preclinical or at an early clinical stage, and the review calls for rigorous, larger biomarker-directed trials.

Key findings

  • The review included 30 eligible studies: randomised studies, observational studies and early clinical trials.
  • Dopaminergic treatment remained central to managing motor symptoms.
  • Gene-, cell- and nanotechnology-based approaches showed potential, but some had been evaluated only in animal or in-vitro models.
  • Emerging interventions were limited by small samples, invasive delivery, short follow-up and insufficient long-term safety information.

Why it matters

The review highlights a widening range of therapeutic targets beyond symptom control, but potential disease-modifying effects have not yet been established across most emerging approaches. The distinction between preclinical promise and evidence in patients is important when interpreting claims of neuroprotection. Larger, biomarker-directed clinical trials are needed to determine whether these strategies can provide effective and sustainable benefit.

What to keep in mind

The review reports that many interventions had small samples, limited follow-up and inadequate long-term safety information; some approaches were assessed only in animal or in-vitro models.

Source

Published in Neurol Sci. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Neurology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.