Predicting IGD treatment outcomes across interventions using a whole-brain functional connectome biomarker.

Dialogues Clin NeurosciOct 12, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchPsychiatry

Meiting Wei, Xin Luo, Jiejie Fu et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This clinical trial study examined whether resting-state whole-brain functional connectivity could predict symptom improvement in 90 individuals with internet gaming disorder (IGD) receiving mindfulness meditation, approach bias modification, or retrieval-aversive conditioning. Connectome-based predictive modelling identified networks associated with reduction in addiction severity from baseline to post-test, with validation in a separate dataset. The negative network predicted symptom reduction (r = 0.401, p <.001), while a combined network showed stronger prediction (r = 0.480, p <.001). The combined model incorporated cerebellar-related connections alongside networks centred on motor, subcortical, and salience systems.

Key findings

  • The negative connectivity network predicted reduction in addiction severity (r = 0.401, p <.001).
  • The combined network predicted reduction in addiction severity (r = 0.480, p <.001), improving on the negative network.
  • The negative network centred mainly on motor, subcortical, and salience networks; positive-network connections were primarily cerebellar-related.
  • The treatment-sensitive network was validated in a separate dataset.

Why it matters

The findings suggest that whole-brain connectivity patterns may help explain variation in IGD symptom improvement across different interventions. In particular, the stronger prediction from the combined model points to potential value in considering cerebellar-related connectivity alongside other network features when developing biomarkers for treatment response. This is an early step toward evaluating whether neural measures can support more individualised treatment research.

What to keep in mind

The study reports predictive associations and external validation, but the abstract does not provide details on the validation dataset or predictive performance there.

Source

Published in Dialogues Clin Neurosci. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Psychiatry

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.