Feasibility of Online and On-Site Physical Activity Delivery Among Older Adults: Mixed Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

JMIR Form ResOct 13, 2026 (epub)

Anna Nilstomt, Johanna Gustavsson, Charlotte Bäccman et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This unblinded, site-cluster-randomized mixed methods pilot trial assessed the feasibility of a 26-week Otago physical activity program delivered online or in person to community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older in Sweden (N=35). Overall attrition was 37% (13/35), with no significant difference between delivery modes (P=.29); most withdrawals occurred in the first 2 weeks. Mean adherence was numerically higher online than on-site, but the difference was not significant. The study was not powered to assess effectiveness, and no intervention-related adverse events were reported.

Key findings

  • Overall attrition was 37% (13/35), with no significant difference between online and on-site delivery (P=.29); most dropouts occurred within 2 weeks.
  • Mean adherence was 17.0 (SD 6.7) online and 12.1 (SD 10.1) on-site, without a significant difference (P=.15).
  • Physical health issues and perceived lack of fit were key reasons for withdrawal; appeal, routine, flexibility, feedback, and social presence supported adherence.
  • No intervention-related adverse events were reported.

Why it matters

The findings suggest that both online and in-person exercise delivery can be feasible for some older adults, while early attrition remains an important challenge. Participants’ accounts point to practical and motivational factors that may support continued participation across formats. These pilot results can inform the design of larger trials, but they do not establish comparative effectiveness.

What to keep in mind

This was a small pilot trial and was not powered to evaluate effectiveness or detect reliable between-mode differences. Participants were recruited from three residential areas in Sweden, and the trial was unblinded.

Source

Published in JMIR Form Res. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Geriatrics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.