Safety and efficacy of delpacibart zotadirsen in Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutations amenable to exon 44 skipping in the USA (EXPLORE44): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 1/2 trial.

Lancet NeurolOct 15, 2026
Clinical ResearchMedical GeneticsNeurology

Aravindhan Veerapandiyan, Jamie Eskuri, Chamindra G Laverty et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

EXPLORE44 was a two-part, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 trial at ten US sites, studying delpacibart zotadirsen (del-zota) in healthy adult men and in ambulatory and non-ambulatory males aged 7–27 years with Duchenne muscular dystrophy amenable to exon 44 skipping. In the DMD group, three doses of del-zota were compared with placebo. Mean exon 44 skipping increased by 36·6% with 5 mg/kg and 43·4% with 10 mg/kg, versus 1·6% with placebo; dystrophin levels also increased. Most adverse events were mild or moderate, although two participants discontinued treatment after reactions.

Key findings

  • Mean exon 44 skipping increased by 36·6% (95% CI 20·8 to 52·4) at 5 mg/kg and 43·4% (32·8 to 54·0) at 10 mg/kg, versus 1·6% (-3·4 to 6·7) with placebo.
  • Mean dystrophin levels increased by 25·0% (9·2 to 40·7) at 5 mg/kg and 25·6% (13·0 to 38·3) at 10 mg/kg, versus -0·7% (-4·8 to 3·3) with placebo.
  • At least one adverse event was reported by 16 (84%) del-zota-treated participants and six (86%) placebo recipients; two participants in the 5 mg/kg group discontinued after adverse reactions.

Why it matters

DMD variants amenable to exon 44 skipping lack approved exon-skipping therapies, and this trial provides early human evidence that del-zota can engage its molecular target and increase dystrophin levels. These biomarker findings are relevant to development of a targeted approach, but do not establish clinical benefit; efficacy and longer-term safety remain to be assessed.

What to keep in mind

The DMD cohorts were small, follow-up for the reported biomarker endpoints was limited to month 4 or month 5, and the trial was not designed to establish clinical efficacy or long-term safety.

Source

Published in Lancet Neurol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Medical Genetics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.