Predicting neurodevelopmental delay among two-year-old infants in Northern Uganda.

Glob Health ActionOct 15, 2026 (epub)

David Mukunya, Grace Ndeezi, Gertrude Namazzi et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This study developed and evaluated a risk-prediction model for neurodevelopmental delay among two-year-old children in Northern Uganda. Children were followed from a cluster-randomized trial cohort, and development was assessed using the Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool. Among 1,421 children assessed, 70 (4.9%; 95% CI: 3.6-6.7%) had delays. Six readily obtainable factors were retained in the model, which had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75 and reasonable calibration. The findings suggest that maternal, birth, and early infant characteristics may help identify children at increased risk.

Key findings

  • Neurodevelopmental delay was identified in 70 of 1,421 children (4.9%; 95% CI: 3.6-6.7%).
  • The final model retained moderate wasting, prolonged neonatal hospitalization, maternal education, place of birth, preterm birth, and absence of skin-to-skin contact.
  • The model's discriminative performance was AUC 0.75, with a calibration slope of 1.37 and calibration belt 0.536-0.727.

Why it matters

Neurodevelopmental assessment and follow-up resources may be limited in low-resource settings. A model based on routinely obtainable maternal, birth, and early infant characteristics could help identify children who may warrant closer developmental follow-up. Its reported discrimination is promising, but the findings concern risk prediction and do not establish that using the model improves developmental outcomes.

What to keep in mind

The model was developed and assessed in children from a single regional cohort, and 21.2% of the children enrolled at the trial's final visit were not followed up.

Source

Published in Glob Health Action. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Pediatrics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.