Comparative Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Orally Disintegrating and Conventional Tablet Formulations of Zastaprazan in Healthy Subjects.

Pharmacol Res PerspectOct 18, 2026
Clinical ResearchGastroenterology

Hyung-Gun Kim, Seunghyun Kang, Sunyoung Min et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This open-label, randomized, single-dose, three-period crossover study compared the pharmacokinetics and safety of 20 mg zastaprazan orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs), taken with or without water, with the conventional tablet in healthy volunteers. Of 54 participants, 51 completed all periods. For both ODT conditions, the 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUCt versus the conventional tablet fell within the predefined bioequivalence range. No additional early systemic exposure was apparent within 30 minutes, and two mild adverse events were reported in one participant.

Key findings

  • For ODT without water versus conventional tablet, Cmax and AUCt geometric mean ratios were 95.05% (88.38%-102.21%) and 108.00% (100.50%-116.06%), respectively.
  • For ODT with water versus conventional tablet, Cmax and AUCt geometric mean ratios were 90.85% (84.96%-97.16%) and 101.88% (96.69%-107.36%), respectively; all 90% confidence intervals met the predefined bioequivalence range.
  • No apparent additional early systemic exposure was observed within 30 min after ODT administration.
  • Two mild adverse events occurred in one subject; no serious adverse events were reported.

Why it matters

The findings indicate that, after a single dose in healthy volunteers, zastaprazan ODT produced pharmacokinetic exposure comparable to the conventional tablet whether taken with or without water. This supports administration flexibility without an observed increase in early systemic exposure. The safety observations were limited to this single-dose study and do not establish safety with repeated use or in patient populations.

What to keep in mind

The study assessed a single dose in healthy volunteers, and 51 of 54 participants completed all periods; it does not establish repeated-dose safety or effects in patients.

Source

Published in Pharmacol Res Perspect. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Gastroenterology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.