Atypical Stafne bone defect: a systematic review.

Clin Oral InvestigOct 17, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchRadiology (Diagnostic)General SurgeryOpen access

Thomas Laidin, Francesca Mangione

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review synthesized English-language case reports and case series of atypically located Stafne bone defects (SBDs), searching four databases through January 2026. It included 70 studies describing 91 cases. The defects were most often reported in the anterior mandible and, despite varied locations, commonly showed well-defined unilocular radiolucencies and lingual cortical depressions. The authors report that cone-beam computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging can help confirm these features and guide diagnostic assessment; histology, when available, most often showed normal salivary gland tissue without neoplastic transformation.

Key findings

  • The review included 70 studies encompassing 91 atypically located Stafne bone defect cases.
  • Atypical defects were most frequently reported in the anterior mandible.
  • Common features included well-defined unilocular radiolucencies and lingual cortical depressions.
  • When histology was available, it most commonly showed normal salivary gland tissue without neoplastic transformation.

Why it matters

Atypical locations can make Stafne bone defects harder to recognize than the usual posterior mandibular presentation. Awareness of their reported imaging and anatomical features may help clinicians include this variant in diagnostic assessment. The review also highlights the potential value of advanced imaging when findings are ambiguous, while its evidence base consists of published case reports and case series.

What to keep in mind

The evidence is drawn from case reports and case series, so it describes reported cases rather than establishing prevalence or comparative diagnostic performance.

Source

Published in Clin Oral Investig. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Radiology (Diagnostic)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.