Efficacy and safety of ifupinostat in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multicenter, single-arm phase 2 study.

Signal Transduct Target TherOct 19, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchOncology (Medical)HematologyOpen access

Yuankai Shi, Peng Liu, Yufu Li et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This multicenter, single-arm phase 2 study evaluated intravenous ifupinostat monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after at least two prior systemic therapy lines. Among 115 patients in the efficacy analysis set, blinded independent central review found an objective response rate of 36.5% (42/115, 95% CI 27.7-46.0), including complete responses in 11.3% (13/115). Median progression-free survival was 2.7 months and median overall survival was 9.9 months. Treatment-related adverse events were frequent, with grade 3 or higher events in 86.7% of the safety set.

Key findings

  • Objective response rate was 36.5% (42/115, 95% CI 27.7-46.0); complete response rate was 11.3% (13/115).
  • Median duration of response was 6.2 months (95% CI 3.5-14.5), median progression-free survival 2.7 months (95% CI 1.6-3.7), and median overall survival 9.9 months (95% CI 7.8-14.8).
  • Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 99.2% (127/128); grade 3 or higher events occurred in 86.7% (111/128).
  • The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related events were thrombocytopenia (75.8%, 97/128), neutropenia (33.6%, 43/128), and leukopenia (22.7%, 29/128); no treatment-related deaths occurred.

Why it matters

Relapsed or refractory DLBCL after multiple prior treatment lines remains a setting in which response and tolerability are clinically important. This study provides prospective evidence of antitumour activity for a dual HDAC and PI3Kα inhibitor, alongside substantial treatment-related toxicity. The response and survival outcomes help characterize the potential and risks of this investigational monotherapy in a heavily pretreated population.

What to keep in mind

The study was single-arm, so it cannot establish comparative benefit against other treatments. The efficacy analysis included 115 patients, fewer than the 128 in the safety set.

Source

Published in Signal Transduct Target Ther. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Oncology (Medical)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.