The effect of seizure-free period on seizure recurrence following antiseizure medication withdrawal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J NeurolOct 20, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchNeurologyPediatricsOpen access

Hongye Zhou, Weihua Zhou, Xin Xu

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis examined whether the duration of seizure freedom before antiseizure medication (ASM) withdrawal is associated with subsequent seizure recurrence in people with epilepsy. The review identified 45 studies involving 10,896 patients; 22 studies with 3933 patients contributed to the meta-analysis. Across epilepsy populations, seizure freedom of <5 years was associated with greater recurrence risk than the comparator period (RR (95% CI) 1.49 (1.17-1.88), p=0.001). The authors also reported subgroup differences by age and region, while noting that evidence is insufficient for strong recommendations on withdrawal timing.

Key findings

  • Across epilepsy populations, <5 years of seizure freedom was associated with greater recurrence risk (RR (95% CI) 1.49 (1.17-1.88), p=0.001).
  • In paediatric patients, <3 years of seizure freedom was associated with higher relapse risk (RR(95% CI) 1.70(1.20-2.39),p=0.003).
  • In adults, <5 years of seizure freedom was associated with higher relapse risk (RR (95% CI) 1.52 (1.02-2.26), p=0.04).
  • The reported lower recurrence risk with ≥10 years of seizure freedom requires further validation because of limited participants and included studies.

Why it matters

The findings suggest that seizure-free duration is relevant when considering recurrence after ASM withdrawal, but the association varies across patient subgroups. This may help frame discussions about withdrawal timing and the uncertainty of relapse risk. The evidence does not establish a universally optimal seizure-free interval, and the authors caution that strong recommendations are not supported.

What to keep in mind

Only 22 of the 45 identified studies contributed to the meta-analysis. The authors specifically note limited participants and included studies for the ≥10-year finding, and state that stronger evidence is needed.

Source

Published in J Neurol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Neurology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.