Effectiveness of digital educational technologies in knowledge acquisition for adolescent health promotion: a systematic review.

Rev Gaucha EnfermOct 19, 2026 (epub)

Maria Eduarda Jucá da Paz Barbosa, Victor Andrew da Silva Teixeira, Jayne Ramos Araujo Moura et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review assessed whether digital educational technologies improve health-promotion knowledge among adolescents. It included 15 studies involving 14,733 adolescents aged 10 to 19 years, with interventions delivered mainly in schools and addressing topics such as HIV prevention, substance use, pregnancy, and sexual, oral, and mental health. Interactive and hybrid multimedia approaches, combining digital content with in-person support, showed greater impact on knowledge acquisition. Static or minimally interactive materials were less effective. The review also noted that technology access inequalities and cultural adaptation may influence outcomes.

Key findings

  • The review included 15 studies and 14,733 adolescents aged 10 to 19 years.
  • Interactive and hybrid multimedia interventions showed greater impact on knowledge acquisition than static or minimally interactive content.
  • Interventions covered HIV prevention, drug use, pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections, and oral, mental, and sexual health.

Why it matters

Digital education is not a uniform intervention: the review suggests that interactivity and in-person support may be important to knowledge gains. This distinction can inform the design and evaluation of adolescent health-promotion programmes. Unequal access to technology and the need for cultural adaptation also matter when considering whether an intervention’s results may apply across settings.

What to keep in mind

The review reports varied interventions and implementation contexts, and its findings are based on knowledge acquisition rather than demonstrated changes in health behaviour or outcomes.

Source

Published in Rev Gaucha Enferm. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Pediatrics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.