SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic biopsy proven MASH patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Diabetes ComplicationsOct 16, 2026 (epub)

Mona S Abdel Monem, Ahmed M Kamel, Maggie M Abbassi et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and random-effects, single-arm meta-analysis assessed SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with diabetes and biopsy-proven MASH. Seven trials contributed 110 patients receiving the intervention. Compared with baseline, pooled measures improved across liver enzymes, imaging and biopsy outcomes, and selected metabolic and cardiometabolic measures. The standardized mean change for biopsy NAFLD Activity Score was -1.18 (95% CI: -2.29 to -0.06). The authors reported that treatment was well tolerated, but noted limited certainty and substantial heterogeneity for some outcomes.

Key findings

  • Biopsy NAFLD Activity Score improved from baseline: SMCR -1.18 (95% CI: -2.29 to -0.06).
  • Controlled attenuation parameter improved: SMCR -0.56 (95% CI: -0.75 to -0.36).
  • Liver stiffness measurement improved: SMCR -0.58 (95% CI: -1.03 to -0.14), with substantial heterogeneity.
  • Pooled analyses also found improvements in liver enzymes, biopsy steatosis, ballooning and fibrosis, waist circumference, ferritin, and systolic blood pressure.

Why it matters

Biopsy-proven MASH is a clinically important liver disease, and these findings suggest SGLT2 inhibitors may have hepatic as well as metabolic effects in patients with concurrent diabetes. However, the evidence is based on small single-arm trial groups and within-group changes, so it does not establish comparative efficacy or show that the observed improvements translate into fewer clinical complications.

What to keep in mind

Only seven trials and 110 intervention-arm patients were included. The single-arm design assessed change from baseline rather than comparative treatment effects, and substantial heterogeneity affected liver stiffness and histological outcomes.

Source

Published in J Diabetes Complications. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Gastroenterology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.