Prediction of death by neurologic criteria in patients with non-traumatic acute brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC NeurolOct 22, 2026 (epub)

Daniela Schoene, Marie Nicklas, Eyad Altarsha et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined predictors of death by neurologic criteria (DNC) after non-traumatic acute brain injury. Eighteen studies included reported cohorts of 9,070 participants, but only four studies (n=1,738) contributed to quantitative synthesis. In stroke cohorts, CT markers of severe intracranial mass effect were associated with higher odds of DNC (pooled OR 3.14, 95%CI 1.98-4.96; p<0.0001; I2=0%). In post-cardiac arrest cohorts, lower gray-white matter ratios were associated with progression to DNC. The authors judged the evidence limited and methodologically heterogeneous.

Key findings

  • In stroke cohorts, CT markers of severe intracranial mass effect were associated with DNC (pooled OR 3.14, 95%CI 1.98-4.96; p<0.0001; I2=0%).
  • In post-cardiac arrest cohorts, lower gray-white matter ratio values were associated with progression to DNC (pooled mean difference -0.15, 95%CI -0.22 to -0.07; p<0.001; I2=72%).
  • Only four studies (n=1,738) contributed to quantitative synthesis, from a review including 18 studies and reported cohorts of 9,070 participants.

Why it matters

Recognising imaging features associated with progression to DNC may help clinicians interpret the severity of acute brain injury and inform prognostic assessment. However, the findings do not establish that these markers can reliably predict DNC in individual patients: the quantitative evidence came from few studies, and the authors describe the overall literature as limited and heterogeneous.

What to keep in mind

Only four studies provided comparable data for quantitative synthesis; the evidence was methodologically heterogeneous, and the post-cardiac arrest gray-white matter ratio analysis had substantial heterogeneity (I2=72%).

Source

Published in BMC Neurol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Neurology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.