Hematological and biochemical responses to three doses of caffeine during the CrossFit® workout: a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.

J Int Soc Sports NutrOct 23, 2026 (epub)

Natalia Główka, Tomasz Podgórski, Jakub Malik et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial examined hematological and biochemical responses to caffeine during a 17-minute CrossFit® workout in 26 moderately trained athletes. Participants received 3, 6, or 9 mg caffeine/kg body mass, or placebo, 70 minutes before exercise. Exercise was the main driver of hematological changes, with no caffeine-specific effects on blood cell indices. The clearest caffeine-related response was glucose: the 6 and 9 mg/kg doses produced significantly greater post-exercise elevations than baseline and placebo visits. Most other biochemical markers were not materially affected by caffeine.

Key findings

  • The 6 and 9 mg caffeine/kg body mass doses produced significantly greater post-exercise glucose elevations than baseline and placebo visits.
  • No caffeine-specific modulation of blood cell indices was observed; exercise was the predominant driver of hematological changes.
  • Phosphate concentrations increased over time, particularly after exercise, but the treatment effect was not retained in sensitivity analysis excluding baseline.
  • Calcium changes were associated with time rather than caffeine treatment, while magnesium remained stable.

Why it matters

The findings distinguish a selective glucose response from broader blood-cell or biochemical effects during this workout. They suggest that acute caffeine intake at the studied doses may alter post-exercise glucose patterns, while offering no evidence here of corresponding caffeine-related changes in hematological indices or most measured mineral markers.

What to keep in mind

The trial involved 26 moderately trained CrossFit® athletes and assessed responses to a single workout after acute caffeine dosing; the abstract does not report longer-term outcomes.

Source

Published in J Int Soc Sports Nutr. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Preventive Medicine / Public Health

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.