Optimal Exercise Dose for Improving Multidimensional Health Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.

Eur J Sport SciNov 1, 2026

Jingyu Wang, Yuxuan He, Zhouluo Wang et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression examined exercise dose-response relationships in colorectal cancer patients. It included 26 randomized controlled trials involving 1,731 patients and synthesized 266 effect sizes across six health-outcome domains. Exercise was associated with significant improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness (ES = 0.35, p < 0.01) and muscular fitness (ES = 0.45, p < 0.01). Analyses suggested threshold effects, with maximal fitness gains requiring sustained moderate-to-high intensity exercise. Prehabilitation interventions appeared most effective; during active treatment, outcomes followed a decline-rebound pattern.

Key findings

  • Cardiorespiratory fitness improved with exercise (ES = 0.35, p < 0.01).
  • Muscular fitness improved with exercise (ES = 0.45, p < 0.01).
  • Regression analyses indicated threshold effects for both fitness outcomes, with maximal gains requiring sustained moderate-to-high intensity exercise.
  • Prehabilitation appeared most effective, while interventions during active treatment showed a decline-rebound trend over time.

Why it matters

The findings suggest that exercise effects in colorectal cancer may depend on both dose and treatment timing, rather than exercise being a uniform intervention. Fitness improvements and the reported treatment-phase patterns can inform how exercise programmes are considered across the care pathway, while the evidence remains based on trial synthesis and does not establish a single optimal prescription for every patient.

What to keep in mind

The abstract does not report the certainty of evidence or detailed risk-of-bias results, limiting assessment of how robust the pooled findings are.

Source

Published in Eur J Sport Sci. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Oncology (Medical)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.