Adjunctive neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser therapy for periodontitis in type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.

J Int Med ResNov 2, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchEndocrinology

Lijun He, Haifeng Hu, Yunhan Wang et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This randomized controlled trial compared conventional nonsurgical periodontal therapy with or without adjunctive neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser therapy in 120 patients with periodontitis and type 2 diabetes. At 6 months, baseline-adjusted mean probing depth was lower with adjunctive laser therapy by 0.70 mm (95% confidence interval, -0.84 to -0.56; p < 0.001). Other periodontal measures and glycemic outcomes also favored the laser group, while gingival recession was slightly greater. No serious treatment-related adverse events were recorded. The authors caution that glycemic outcomes were secondary and follow-up was limited to 6 months.

Key findings

  • Adjusted 6-month mean probing depth was 0.70 mm lower with adjunctive laser therapy (95% confidence interval, -0.84 to -0.56; p < 0.001).
  • Clinical attachment level and bleeding on probing-positive sites favored laser therapy: adjusted differences were -0.67 mm and -11.3 percentage points, respectively.
  • Adjusted glycosylated hemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose differences favored laser therapy (-0.26% and -0.62 mmol/L, respectively; both p < 0.001).
  • Gingival recession was slightly higher with laser therapy (+0.09 mm; p = 0.004); no serious treatment-related adverse events were recorded.

Why it matters

The trial suggests that adding this laser therapy to nonsurgical periodontal treatment may improve periodontal measures over 6 months in patients with periodontitis and type 2 diabetes. The observed glycemic changes are potentially relevant but remain secondary outcomes, so they should not be interpreted as evidence that laser treatment provides established glycemic benefit.

What to keep in mind

Follow-up was limited to 6 months, and glycemic variables were secondary endpoints. Baseline gingival recession differed modestly between groups.

Source

Published in J Int Med Res. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Endocrinology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.