An Exploratory Study of Image-Guided Cochlear Implant Intervention on Articulation and Phonological Processing in Children With Speech Sound Disorders.

Am J Speech Lang PatholNov 2, 2026 (epub)

Mackenzie Lighterink, Rene H Gifford, Ferenc Bunta et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This exploratory analysis examined articulation and phonological processing in 21 children aged 4.7–13.1 years with cochlear implants and deficits in these skills, enrolled in a 2-year waitlist-deferred randomized controlled trial of image-guided cochlear implant programming (IGCIP). Articulation improved relative to age norms over time, whereas phonological processing did not. IGCIP had no statistically significant effect on either outcome during the first year. However, children who received IGCIP in that year showed larger, clinically meaningful articulation-score improvements than those who did not, a finding requiring confirmation in a larger sample.

Key findings

  • Articulation, but not phonological processing, improved relative to age norms over time.
  • IGCIP had no statistically significant first-year effect on articulation or phonological processing.
  • Children receiving IGCIP in the first year had larger, clinically meaningful articulation-score improvements than those not receiving it.

Why it matters

The findings distinguish the developmental course of articulation from phonological processing in children with cochlear implants, suggesting these outcomes may not change in parallel. The possible articulation benefit associated with IGCIP is clinically relevant but remains exploratory: the analysis involved a small subset, and the first-year treatment effect was not statistically significant.

What to keep in mind

The analysis included only 21 children from the trial, and the exploratory IGCIP findings were not statistically significant in the first year.

Source

Published in Am J Speech Lang Pathol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Otolaryngology (ENT)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.