Firearm Injury Prevention Bystander Intervention for Adolescents in Shooting Sports: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Health ForumNov 6, 2026 (epub)

Megan L Ranney, Guangyu Tong, Rinad S Beidas et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This parallel cluster randomized clinical trial evaluated a 3-session, co-developed firearm injury prevention bystander curriculum among adolescents in US 4-H Shooting Sports clubs. Fifty sites contributed baseline data, including 424 youth; among participants with reported family firearm ownership, 87.4% reported ownership. Compared with standard programming, the intervention produced a small increase in intention to use bystander intervention at 3 months (Β = 0.10; 95% CI, 0.003-0.19), but not at 6 months. Firearm injury risk knowledge improved at both follow-ups, while perceived behavioral control improved at 3 months.

Key findings

  • Behavioral intention was modestly higher in intervention sites at 3 months (Β = 0.10; 95% CI, 0.003-0.19), with no difference at 6 months.
  • The intervention improved firearm injury risk knowledge at both 3 and 6 months in complete-case and multiple-imputation analyses.
  • Perceived behavioral control improved at 3 months.

Why it matters

Adolescents in shooting sports settings may encounter situations where bystander action could help prevent firearm injury. This trial suggests that a curriculum developed with a firearm-owning community can improve relevant knowledge and may briefly strengthen intentions to intervene. The findings also illustrate the potential value of partnerships between public health researchers and community organizations when designing prevention programs.

What to keep in mind

Behavioral intention was assessed using hypothetical scenarios rather than observed intervention behavior, and the intention effect was not present at 6 months. Baseline data were available from 50 of 61 randomized sites.

Source

Published in JAMA Health Forum. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Preventive Medicine / Public Health

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.