Cellular and Histopathological Hallmarks of Acute and Chronic Rejection in Vascular Composite Allografts: A Systematic Review.

Clin TransplantNov 1, 2026

Leonard Knoedler, Tobias Niederegger, Jakob Fenske et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review synthesized human studies describing cellular, immunophenotypic, and histopathological features of acute and chronic rejection in vascular composite allografts (VCAs). Across 51 studies, 208 rejection episodes were reported: 177 (85%) were acute and 31 (15%) chronic, with distributions differing by VCA type (p < 0.0001). Acute rejection was predominantly T-cell-driven, whereas chronic rejection was characterized by endothelial involvement, graft vasculopathy, and fibrosis. The authors found heterogeneous patterns across graft types and noted limited reporting, particularly for chronic rejection.

Key findings

  • Of 208 reported rejection episodes, 177 (85%) were acute and 31 (15%) chronic; distributions differed by VCA type (p < 0.0001).
  • Acute rejection was mainly T-cell-driven, with CD8+ cells in 49%, CD4+ in 47%, and CD3+ in 35%.
  • Chronic rejection featured endothelial involvement or graft vasculopathy (n = 10, 20%) and fibrosis (n = 6, 12%).
  • Histopathology was reported in 78% of studies; cellular infiltrates were reported in 73% and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates in 71%.

Why it matters

Acute and chronic rejection show different, graft-type-dependent immune and tissue injury patterns. Recognizing these distinctions may help frame VCA surveillance and interpretation of biopsy findings. The review also highlights that the evidence base is heterogeneous and chronic rejection is less well documented, limiting confidence in consistent diagnostic approaches.

What to keep in mind

Heterogeneity in the included studies precluded meta-analysis, and reported data were limited, especially for chronic rejection.

Source

Published in Clin Transplant. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Pathology (Anatomic & Clinical)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.