Pre-hospital heparin is not associated with infarct vessel patency and mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Clin Res CardiolAug 1, 2024 (epub)
Clinical ResearchCardiologyEmergency MedicineOpen access

Phillip Scholz, Tim Friede, Karl Heinrich Scholz et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This analysis examined whether pre-hospital heparin was associated with infarct-artery patency and mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). It used data from 394 OHCA participants in a prospective, multicentre trial cohort; 272 (69%) received heparin from emergency medical services. Although univariate in-hospital mortality was lower with heparin (26.8% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.002), heparin was not a significant mortality predictor after regression adjustment (OR = 0.992; p = 0.981), and was not associated with pre-revascularization TIMI flow grade (OR = 0.840; p = 0.724).

Key findings

  • Pre-hospital heparin was given to 272 (69%) of 394 STEMI patients with OHCA.
  • Univariate in-hospital mortality was 26.8% vs. 42.6% with and without pre-hospital heparin, respectively (p = 0.002).
  • After regression adjustment, heparin was not a significant mortality predictor (OR = 0.992; p = 0.981).
  • Heparin was not associated with infarct-artery TIMI flow before revascularization (OR = 0.840; p = 0.724).

Why it matters

The lower unadjusted mortality among heparin recipients did not persist in the regression model, and no association with early infarct-artery patency was observed. This distinction is clinically important when interpreting apparent benefits in non-randomised treatment comparisons, where differences in who receives treatment may influence crude outcome estimates.

What to keep in mind

This was an analysis of trial-cohort data rather than a reported randomised comparison of pre-hospital heparin; treatment allocation may therefore be subject to confounding.

Source

Published in Clin Res Cardiol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.