The effect of acupuncture on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and circadian rhythm in patients with essential hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Blood PressDec 23, 2025 (epub)

Huawei Gao, Zhihong Li, Wenxiang Zhan et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed acupuncture’s effects on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and circadian rhythm in people with essential hypertension. It included 13 randomised controlled trials involving 1,080 patients. Compared with control treatment, acupuncture was associated with lower 24-hour average systolic and diastolic blood pressure; the mean difference was -3.57 for systolic pressure (95% CI -5.04 to -2.10) and -3.61 for diastolic pressure (95% CI -5.12 to -2.10). The analysis also reported improvements in blood pressure variability and load, and the authors concluded that acupuncture added to Western medication improved these measures and circadian rhythm.

Key findings

  • Acupuncture groups had lower 24-hour average systolic BP than controls (MD = -3.57, 95% CI: -5.04 to -2.10, p < 0.001).
  • The 24-hour average diastolic BP difference was MD = -3.61 (95% CI: -5.12 to -2.10, p < 0.001).
  • Acupuncture was associated with lower 24-hour SBP variability (MD = -1.15) and DBP variability (MD = -0.96); both p < 0.001.
  • The review reported lower 24-hour SBP and DBP load and improvement in BP circadian rhythm with acupuncture added to Western medication.

Why it matters

Ambulatory blood pressure captures average pressure, variability, load and circadian pattern, providing a broader assessment than a single measurement. The pooled findings suggest acupuncture alongside Western medication may improve several of these measures in essential hypertension. However, the abstract does not establish whether these changes translate into fewer cardiovascular events or durable clinical benefit.

What to keep in mind

The findings combine 13 trials, and the abstract provides no details on trial quality, follow-up duration, or the units for the reported mean differences, limiting assessment of robustness and clinical magnitude.

Source

Published in Blood Press. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.