Short-Term PM 2.5 Exposure and Cardiovascular Mortality: A Global Exposure-Response Analysis to Inform Alert Thresholds.

J Am Coll CardiolFeb 18, 2026 (epub)

Yongkang Yang, Jianyu Deng, Peng Zhou et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis combined 100 epidemiologic studies (123 effect estimates) to characterise the global nonlinear association between short-term ambient PM2.5 exposure and cardiovascular mortality and assess an alert threshold. Each 10 μg/m³ increase in PM2.5 was associated with a pooled cardiovascular mortality risk ratio of 1.0090 (95% CI: 1.0074-1.0106). The estimated optimal alert value was 136 μg/m³ (95% CI: 129-148); the model suggested this could prevent 73.2% (95% CI: 71.8%-76.6%) of attributable deaths while affecting 32% of at-risk person-days.

Key findings

  • For every 10 μg/m³ increase in short-term PM2.5, the pooled cardiovascular mortality risk ratio was 1.0090 (95% CI: 1.0074-1.0106).
  • The exposure-response curve was supralinear: marginal risk flattened at ∼75-150 μg/m³ and rose sharply above 150 μg/m³.
  • The estimated 2023 global cardiovascular deaths attributable to PM2.5 episodes exceeding 75 μg/m³ were 59,399 (95% CI: 38,126-82,413).
  • An alert value of 136 μg/m³ (95% CI: 129-148) was estimated to prevent 73.2% (95% CI: 71.8%-76.6%) of attributable deaths while affecting 32% of at-risk person-days.

Why it matters

The analysis quantifies how cardiovascular mortality risk varies across short-term PM2.5 concentrations, rather than assuming a uniform increase in risk. Its modelled alert threshold offers a way to consider health protection alongside the disruption of alerts. These estimates may inform evaluation of warning systems, while remaining dependent on the underlying epidemiologic evidence and modelling assumptions.

What to keep in mind

The alert threshold and deaths prevented are model-based estimates derived from pooled epidemiologic studies and global exposure, population, and baseline mortality data; they are not results of a trial of an alert system.

Source

Published in J Am Coll Cardiol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.