Tricuspid Regurgitation and Impact of Surgical Valve Intervention in the Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial.

Pediatr CardiolFeb 18, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchCardiologyPediatricsCardiothoracic SurgeryOpen access

J F Cnota, S M Chowdhury, A Floh et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This analysis of the Pediatric Heart Network’s Single Ventricle Reconstruction trial examined serial tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and transplant-free survival in children with single right ventricle anomalies followed to age 6 years. Echocardiograms were assessed at six stages of palliation, and TR was classified as mild or less versus greater than mild. Greater-than-mild TR increased from 12 to 24% between baseline and after the Norwood operation (p < 0.001), then remained stable among survivors. It was associated with lower transplant-free survival at several time points; early tricuspid valve intervention was not associated with improved survival.

Key findings

  • Greater-than-mild TR rose from 12 to 24% from baseline to post-Norwood (p < 0.001), with the proportion stable thereafter among survivors.
  • Transplant-free survival at 6 years was lower with greater-than-mild TR at every assessed time except pre-Fontan.
  • Greater-than-mild TR was associated with larger baseline tricuspid valve annular area and greater right ventricular volume, but not reduced function.
  • Tricuspid valve intervention at Norwood and/or Stage II was associated with a higher rate of death or transplant than no intervention or later intervention.

Why it matters

The findings identify greater-than-mild TR as a marker associated with poorer transplant-free survival during staged palliation for single right ventricle anomalies. They also show that early valve intervention was not associated with better survival in this cohort, underscoring the need to interpret TR severity and intervention outcomes in the context of disease severity and timing.

What to keep in mind

The reported intervention comparisons are observational within the trial cohort, so they do not establish whether valve intervention changes survival.

Source

Published in Pediatr Cardiol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.