12-Month Clinical Outcomes Using a Variable-Loop Circular Catheter for PFA in a Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Population.

Pacing Clin ElectrophysiolMay 28, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchCardiology

Hailong Tao, Heng Cai, Hua Fu et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

The afIRE study was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial of variable-loop circular catheter pulsed field ablation in Chinese adults with symptomatic, drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing first-time pulmonary vein isolation. In the 123-patient main-stage cohort, 12-month primary effectiveness success was 74.8%, while freedom from symptomatic recurrence was 87.0%. Acute pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients. Primary adverse events occurred in 2 patients (1.6%), both involving vascular complications and considered unlikely to be device-related.

Key findings

  • At 12 months, primary effectiveness success was 74.8%; freedom from symptomatic recurrence was 87.0%.
  • Acute pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients; 89.4% had no acute reconnection.
  • Primary adverse events occurred in 2 patients (1.6%); both were vascular complications considered unlikely to be device-related.
  • Preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥ 60%) was associated with 86% reduction in odds of 12-month atrial arrhythmia recurrence.

Why it matters

These results add prospective evidence on pulsed field ablation with a variable-loop catheter in a Chinese population, where evidence had been limited. The reported effectiveness and low incidence of primary adverse events provide useful context for assessing whether outcomes observed in European and US studies are reproducible across populations, while the single-arm design limits comparative conclusions.

What to keep in mind

The study was single-arm, so it cannot establish comparative effectiveness or safety against another ablation approach.

Source

Published in Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.