A phase 2 trial of daratumumab monotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed cardiac stage IIIb AL amyloidosis.

BloodOct 15, 2026
Clinical ResearchHematologyCardiology

Efstathios Kastritis, Monique C Minnema, Meletios A Dimopoulos et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This prospective, multicentre phase 2 trial evaluated daratumumab monotherapy in previously untreated patients with measurable AL amyloidosis and advanced cardiac stage IIIB disease; patients with inadequate response after three cycles could add bortezomib and dexamethasone. Among 40 enrolled patients, the 6-month overall survival rate was 65% (95% confidence interval, 48.2-77.6), and median overall survival was 10.4 months. By 6 months, 75% had achieved a partial hematologic response or better, while the cardiac response rate was 30%. The authors considered treatment feasible and well tolerated.

Key findings

  • The 6-month overall survival rate was 65% (95% confidence interval, 48.2-77.6); median overall survival was 10.4 months.
  • By 6 months, 75% achieved a partial hematologic response or better, including 47.5% with very good partial response or better and 12.5% with complete response.
  • The median time to first hematologic response was 1 week, and to best response was 2.3 months.
  • Cardiac response at 6 months was 30%; common serious adverse events included cardiac failure (25%), sudden cardiac death (10%), and acute kidney injury (7.5%).

Why it matters

Stage IIIB cardiac AL amyloidosis is a high-risk setting with limited treatment options. This trial provides prospective evidence that daratumumab-based treatment can produce rapid hematologic responses in this population, alongside reported survival and cardiac response outcomes. The serious cardiac and renal events also underscore the substantial clinical risk in this group and the importance of interpreting response alongside safety.

What to keep in mind

The trial was a phase 2 study with 40 patients and no concurrent comparator. The abstract’s comparison of survival with historical cohorts does not establish comparative treatment benefit.

Source

Published in Blood. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Hematology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.