Clinical outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients: a meta-analysis with time-to-event data reconstruction.

J Interv Card ElectrophysiolJun 24, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchCardiologyGeriatrics

Ali Saad Al-Shammari, Ahmed Mazen Amin, Ameer Awashra et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared long-term outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly and non-elderly patients, drawing on 28 studies involving 22,921 patients. Elderly patients had a higher risk of AF recurrence (RR 1.174, 95% CI 1.068-1.290; P < 0.001), a finding also supported by reconstructed time-to-event analysis (HR 1.138, 95% CI 1.055-1.227; P = 0.001). The analysis also found higher risks of all-cause mortality, stroke, and several procedural complications in elderly patients.

Key findings

  • AF recurrence was more frequent in elderly patients (RR 1.174, 95% CI 1.068-1.290; P < 0.001).
  • Reconstructed time-to-event analysis also showed higher recurrence risk (HR 1.138, 95% CI 1.055-1.227; P = 0.001).
  • Elderly patients had higher risks of all-cause mortality (RR 3.978, 95% CI 2.852-5.547; P < 0.001) and stroke (RR 2.136, 95% CI 1.336-3.414; P = 0.002).
  • Risks of hemopericardium/tamponade, atrioesophageal fistula, and pulmonary vein stenosis were also higher in elderly patients.

Why it matters

The findings indicate that age is associated with differences in both efficacy and safety after AF ablation. Considering recurrence alongside mortality, stroke, and procedural complications can help frame discussions about expected outcomes and the balance of potential benefits and harms. The results support careful, individualized assessment rather than assuming outcomes are equivalent across age groups.

What to keep in mind

The meta-analysis combined comparative studies, and reconstructed time-to-event data were derived from Kaplan-Meier curves rather than individual patient records. The abstract does not report the underlying studies’ designs or follow-up durations.

Source

Published in J Interv Card Electrophysiol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.