Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of an Escherichia coli-produced nine-valent human papillomavirus vaccine: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

Lancet Infect DisJun 30, 2026 (epub)

Hong-Xing Pan, Zhao-Feng Bi, Yu-Lin Jing et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial compared an Escherichia coli-produced nine-valent HPV vaccine with a bivalent vaccine in healthy, unvaccinated women aged 18–45 years in China. Among 9,327 participants, antibody responses to HPV 16 and 18 met the prespecified non-inferiority criteria. In the modified intention-to-treat population, efficacy against 12-month persistent infection with HPV types 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58 was 98.2% (95% CI 89.6–100). Adverse reactions were more frequent with the nine-valent vaccine, while serious adverse events occurred at similar rates and none were considered vaccine-related.

Key findings

  • Antibody responses to HPV 16 and 18 were non-inferior to those elicited by the bivalent vaccine.
  • Efficacy against 12-month persistent infection with HPV types 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58 was 98.2% (95% CI 89.6–100).
  • Adverse reactions occurred in 52.1% of the nine-valent group and 42.2% of the bivalent group.
  • Serious adverse events occurred in 11.0% and 10.3%, respectively; none were considered related to vaccination.

Why it matters

The trial provides comparative phase 3 evidence that this nine-valent vaccine generates non-inferior responses to HPV 16 and 18 while protecting against persistent infection from five additional vaccine-targeted types. Its safety findings help characterise the trade-off of more reported adverse reactions without an apparent increase in serious events. The authors note that low production cost could support broader access, although access was not tested in this trial.

What to keep in mind

Follow-up was ongoing, so the abstract reports persistent-infection efficacy and immunogenicity outcomes rather than longer-term protection.

Source

Published in Lancet Infect Dis. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.