Catheter Ablation for Supraventricular Tachycardia in Infants: A Systematic Review and Selective Meta-Analysis.

Pacing Clin ElectrophysiolAug 25, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchCardiologyPediatrics

Karin Vasic, Aleksandar Markovic

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and selective meta-analysis assessed catheter ablation outcomes for supraventricular tachycardia in infants aged 12 months or younger, generally considered for drug-refractory or life-threatening cases. Five studies contributed to the qualitative review; four observational studies, comprising 57 infants, were pooled using a single-arm random-effects model. The pooled acute procedural success rate was 93% (95% CI 84%-98%), while the pooled complication rate was 7% (95% CI 3%-17%). Arrhythmia recurrence was reported in 9% (95% CI 4%-19%) during 6-24 months of follow-up.

Key findings

  • Pooled acute procedural success was 93% (95% CI 84%-98%; I 2 ≤5%) across four studies comprising 57 infants.
  • The pooled complication rate was 7% (95% CI 3%-17%; I 2 ≤5%).
  • Arrhythmia recurrence occurred in 9% of infants (95% CI 4%-19%) during 6-24 months of follow-up.
  • No permanent atrioventricular block or procedure-related deaths were reported.

Why it matters

Infant ablation is undertaken in a population for whom pharmacological therapy is usually first-line and procedural decisions require careful risk assessment. These pooled findings provide an estimate of reported success, complications, and recurrence in selected infants, while underscoring that the evidence base is too limited to establish outcomes broadly or resolve optimal patient selection and timing.

What to keep in mind

Evidence came from a small number of highly selected observational studies, with potential publication and referral bias; the authors call for larger prospective multicenter studies.

Source

Published in Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.