Global Efficacy of Aficamten in Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Results From ACACIA-HCM.

CirculationAug 28, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchCardiologyOpen access

Martin S Maron, Ahmad Masri, Ankit Bhatia et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This randomized, placebo-controlled trial analysis assessed multiple treatment responses to aficamten in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (nHCM), using outcomes measured at week 36. Response criteria covered symptoms, exercise capacity, left atrial volume, septal diastolic velocity, and NT-proBNP. A partial or complete response—improvement in at least three of these five measures—occurred in 53% of patients receiving aficamten versus 14% receiving placebo (P<0.001). Aficamten was associated with improvement across several measures, although the between-group difference in peak oxygen uptake improvement was not statistically significant.

Key findings

  • At week 36, at least three favorable outcomes were achieved by 53% with aficamten versus 14% with placebo (P<0.001).
  • Symptom burden improved in 71% versus 53%, and septal e' improved in 51% versus 26%, with aficamten versus placebo (P<0.05 for both).
  • NT-proBNP decreased by at least 50% in 63% with aficamten versus 5% with placebo (P<0.05).
  • Peak oxygen uptake improved in 45% versus 37%; this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.1).

Why it matters

nHCM is associated with substantial morbidity, and the abstract notes that no treatment is approved for the condition. Assessing several domains together suggests aficamten may benefit more than one aspect of disease burden, including symptoms and measures related to diastolic function. The findings also show that response varied by outcome, with no statistically significant difference reported for peak oxygen uptake.

What to keep in mind

The analysis reports outcomes at week 36; longer-term effects are not established by the abstract. The responder categories depend on thresholds across five selected measures.

Source

Published in Circulation. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.