Spatiotemporal analysis of influenza, pneumonia, and respiratory syncytial virus in association with environmental factors: A systematic review.

Public HealthSep 4, 2026 (epub)

Md Momin Islam, Farha Musharrat Noor, Vishal Singh et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review assessed studies using spatiotemporal models to examine environmental factors associated with influenza, pneumonia, and respiratory syncytial virus. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Temperature and humidity were the most frequently identified environmental determinants, while Bayesian hierarchical models were the leading approach for accounting for spatial and temporal dependencies. Associations were often nonlinear and differed by location; area-level socioeconomic conditions modified local infection risk. The review concludes that environmental effects can be complex and delayed, supporting attention to local environmental and socioeconomic context in surveillance.

Key findings

  • Twelve studies met the review’s inclusion criteria.
  • Temperature and humidity were the most frequently identified environmental determinants.
  • Bayesian hierarchical models were the leading framework for handling spatial and temporal dependencies.
  • Environmental associations were often nonlinear and geographically variable, with area-level socioeconomic conditions influencing local infection risk.

Why it matters

Respiratory infection risk may not respond uniformly to environmental conditions across regions. The review highlights that local socioeconomic context can shape these associations, so broad averages may obscure meaningful differences. Incorporating local environmental characteristics and socioeconomic vulnerability into surveillance could help public health systems interpret and monitor risk across diverse areas.

What to keep in mind

The review included only twelve studies, and the abstract reports substantial variation in modelling approaches, climates, and geographic scales, limiting the consistency of comparisons.

Source

Published in Public Health. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Infectious Diseases

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.