Diagnostic accuracy of the VISITECT CD4 lateral-flow assay for screening advanced HIV disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Int J Infect DisSep 5, 2026 (epub)

Behailu Taye Gebremeskele, Haile Tesfaye, Workineh Woldeselassie Hammeso et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the VISITECT-CD4 lateral-flow assay for advanced HIV disease, using flow cytometry as the comparator. Ten studies included 6962 people with HIV. Pooled sensitivity was 98% (95% CI: 94-99%) and specificity was 71% (95% CI: 56-85%), with an area under the curve of 0.95. Sensitivity was similar for capillary and venous blood. The authors concluded that the assay met the target product profile’s sensitivity requirement for point-of-care CD4 tests, while pooled specificity was below its target.

Key findings

  • Across ten studies and 6962 people with HIV, pooled sensitivity was 98% (95% CI: 94-99%) and specificity was 71% (95% CI: 56-85%).
  • The assay’s area under the curve was 0.95.
  • Sensitivity was 96% (95% CI: 93-97%) with capillary blood and 99% (95% CI: 93-100%) with venous blood.

Why it matters

Reliable point-of-care identification of advanced HIV disease can support timely screening and prophylaxis for opportunistic infections, including in decentralized settings. The high pooled sensitivity and similar performance with capillary and venous samples are encouraging for screening, but the lower pooled specificity means positive results may require careful interpretation within the diagnostic pathway.

What to keep in mind

Pooled specificity was below the target product profile’s ≥80% target. The authors also identified a need for further research in South American and Asian populations.

Source

Published in Int J Infect Dis. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Infectious Diseases

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.