Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous efgartigimod with prednisone in moderate-to-severe pemphigus (ADDRESS): a global, phase III, randomised controlled, double-blind trial.

Br J DermatolOct 19, 2026

Pascal Joly, Dedee F Murrell, Yumi Aoyama et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

ADDRESS was a global, phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adults with newly diagnosed or relapsing moderate-to-severe pemphigus. Participants received weekly subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 or placebo, alongside prednisone. Among participants with pemphigus vulgaris, complete remission on minimal prednisone by week 30, sustained for at least 8 weeks, occurred in 35.5% with efgartigimod and 30.3% with placebo (P = 0.60; odds ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 0.60-2.41). The trial found no clinical benefit over prednisone alone, despite reductions in IgG and pemphigus autoantibodies.

Key findings

  • Complete remission on minimal prednisone by week 30 occurred in 44/124 (35.5%) with efgartigimod and 20/66 (30.3%) with placebo; P = 0.60.
  • Prednisone consumption over time was comparable between groups, and antibody reductions with efgartigimod did not translate to improved Pemphigus Disease Area Index scores.
  • Adverse events occurred in 89.1% (n = 131/147) with efgartigimod and 76.0% (n = 57/75) with placebo; serious adverse events occurred in 12.2% and 13.3%, respectively.

Why it matters

The trial illustrates that lowering total IgG and disease-associated autoantibodies does not necessarily improve clinical outcomes in pemphigus. For clinicians assessing therapies that target disease mechanisms, the patient-centred remission outcome is important alongside pharmacodynamic effects. In this study, adding efgartigimod to prednisone did not improve remission over prednisone alone by 30 weeks.

What to keep in mind

The primary efficacy outcome was assessed in participants with pemphigus vulgaris; the abstract does not report a corresponding efficacy result for the smaller pemphigus foliaceus group.

Source

Published in Br J Dermatol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Dermatology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.