Incidence and Predictors of Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation According to VARC-3 Criteria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

J Am Heart AssocSep 29, 2026 (epub)

Federico Giacobbe, Francesco Bruno, Marco Brero et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled 57 studies involving 73 588 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), with complications classified using VARC-3 criteria. Technical success was 95%, while all-cause mortality at an average 12 months of follow-up was 10.2%. Permanent pacemaker implantation was the most frequent reported complication (13%), followed by type 2 or greater bleeding (9.7%). Study-level analyses associated several complications, including acute kidney injury and bleeding, with higher mortality; these findings describe associations rather than causal effects.

Key findings

  • Across 57 studies and 73 588 patients, technical success was 95% and 30-day device success was 90%.
  • All-cause mortality at an average 12 months of follow-up was 10.2%.
  • Permanent pacemaker implantation occurred in 13% and type 2 or greater bleeding in 9.7%.
  • Study-level analyses associated acute kidney injury, bleeding, paravalvular regurgitation, non-structural valve dysfunction, and higher STS score with higher mortality.

Why it matters

The pooled estimates provide a broad picture of procedural success and complication burden when TAVI outcomes are classified using VARC-3 definitions. The associations between complications and mortality underscore the clinical importance of monitoring adverse events and interpreting procedural success alongside subsequent outcomes. Variation across the included studies may affect how directly pooled rates apply to individual settings.

What to keep in mind

The analysis pooled study-level data from multiple studies; predictor associations therefore do not establish causation or individual-level risk.

Source

Published in J Am Heart Assoc. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.