EACTS Expert Consensus Document on aortic valve repair and valve-sparing aortic root replacement procedures.

Eur J Cardiothorac SurgOct 7, 2026

Ruggero De Paulis, Giulio Folino, Alain Berrebi et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This EACTS Expert Consensus Document critically reviews evidence on aortic valve repair and valve-sparing aortic root replacement for aortic regurgitation and proximal thoracic aortic aneurysms across age groups. It addresses mechanisms of disease, echocardiographic assessment and patient selection, intraoperative and prognostic evaluation, and surgical techniques. The document sets out shared surgical principles and consensus statements intended to support standardized clinical decision-making. It is a consensus statement informed by a critical evaluation of current evidence; where high-quality evidence is lacking, recommendations draw on multidisciplinary expert judgement. The abstract reports no quantitative outcome estimate.

Key findings

  • The document reviews echocardiographic parameters for patient selection, intraoperative assessment, and prognostic evaluation.
  • It outlines fundamental surgical principles shared across different aortic valve repair methods.
  • Where high-quality evidence is unavailable, guidance relies on the multidisciplinary author team's experience and expert judgement.

Why it matters

Aortic valve repair involves varied disease mechanisms and surgical approaches, making coordinated assessment important. By bringing together evidence and expert consensus on imaging, selection, operative assessment, and technique, the document offers a framework for more consistent decision-making across paediatric and adult care. Its recommendations should be interpreted in light of the evidence gaps it acknowledges.

What to keep in mind

The document notes that high-quality evidence is unavailable for some areas, so guidance there relies on expert judgement.

Source

Published in Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.