Association of virulence genes with biofilm formation in clinical Enterococcus faecalis isolates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Arch MicrobiolOct 10, 2026 (epub)

Abdulhamit Çalı, Safiye Göçer

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis assessed associations between virulence gene carriage and microplate-measured biofilm formation in human clinical Enterococcus faecalis isolates. It included 26 studies and 1848 isolates. For strong versus non-strong biofilm formation, esp carriage was associated with higher odds (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.32-4.13). Associations varied by gene and biofilm phenotype; esp was the most consistent finding in sensitivity analyses, but its presence alone was insufficient to predict biofilm phenotype.

Key findings

  • For strong versus non-strong biofilm formation, esp was associated with higher odds (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.32-4.13).
  • For any biofilm versus none, significant associations were reported for asa1 (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.39-4.67), esp (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.82-4.04), agg (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.25-2.78), and cylA (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.20-3.91).
  • Strong biofilm formation was also associated with efaA (OR 26.28, 95% CI 1.12-614.84) and sprE (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.18-7.92); estimates were based on few studies and were imprecise.
  • Sensitivity analyses found esp to be the most consistent association, while heterogeneity remained for strong biofilm formation.

Why it matters

The findings indicate that virulence gene carriage and biofilm phenotype are related in gene-specific and phenotype-dependent ways. This helps frame biofilm assessment as more complex than screening for a single gene: even the most consistent association, esp, does not by itself predict whether an isolate will form biofilm. The results also highlight uncertainty around some gene-specific estimates.

What to keep in mind

The efaA and sprE estimates were based on few studies and were imprecise; heterogeneity remained for strong biofilm formation.

Source

Published in Arch Microbiol. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Infectious Diseases

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.