Prevalence and genotype distribution of norovirus and rotavirus among children under five with diarrheal infection in lower-middle-income countries after Rotavirus vaccine introduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PLoS OneOct 13, 2026 (epub)

Firayad Ayele, Tesfaye Assebe, Miheret Mandefro et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed norovirus and rotavirus prevalence and genotype distribution among children under five with diarrheal infection in low- and middle-income countries after rotavirus vaccine introduction. Across 35,704 children, the pooled prevalence of the two viruses combined was 18% (95% CI: 15-21%). Rotavirus prevalence was 24% (95% CI: 19.6-28.3%), compared with 13% (95% CI: 11-15%) for norovirus. Norovirus GII predominated, particularly GII.4; G3[P8] and G1[P8] were the most frequently identified rotavirus genotypes.

Key findings

  • Combined pooled prevalence of norovirus and rotavirus was 18% (95% CI: 15-21%) among children with diarrheal infection.
  • Rotavirus prevalence was 24% (95% CI: 19.6-28.3%), versus 13% (95% CI: 11-15%) for norovirus.
  • Norovirus GII accounted for 76% of genotypes; GII.4 represented 53% of cases, followed by GI at 23%.
  • The most frequently identified rotavirus genotypes were G3[P8] (39%) and G1[P8] (17%).

Why it matters

The findings indicate that both viruses remain relevant causes of diarrheal illness in young children in LMICs after rotavirus vaccine introduction. The reported genotype distribution provides context for surveillance and for assessing whether circulating strains change over time, while the substantial between-study heterogeneity cautions against assuming these pooled estimates apply uniformly across settings.

What to keep in mind

Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (I2 = 98.72%, p < 0.001), limiting the uniformity of pooled estimates across settings.

Source

Published in PLoS One. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Pediatrics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.