Bacterial infections and antibiotic susceptibility in children with sickle-cell anemia on malaria chemoprevention using Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) or Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) in Uganda.

PLoS OneOct 15, 2026 (epub)

Winnie Nambatya, Moses Ocan, Grace Ndeezi et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This analysis nested within a randomized, double-blind trial assessed bacterial infections and antimicrobial resistance among Ugandan children aged 6 months to 15 years with sickle-cell anemia receiving weekly dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) or monthly sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP). Participants were followed for a median of 14.7 months, with blood cultures obtained during febrile episodes. Pathogenic bacteria were infrequently isolated; cumulative incidence of bacterial growth over 22 months was 2.3% (95% CI: 1.12-4.73). All isolates were multidrug-resistant, and sul2 was detected in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli.

Key findings

  • Cumulative incidence of bacterial growth over 22 months was 2.3% (95% CI: 1.12-4.73).
  • Pathogens isolated included Escherichia coli (3), Klebsiella pneumoniae (2), Staphylococcus aureus (2), Streptococcus agalactiae (1), and Enterococcus faecalis (1).
  • All isolates were multidrug-resistant; sul2 was identified in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli.

Why it matters

The findings indicate that culture-confirmed bacterial infection was uncommon in this cohort, while recovered pathogens showed multidrug resistance. Detection of sul2 in two species also highlights a potential mechanism of plasmid-mediated sulfonamide resistance. These observations add context for interpreting febrile illness and resistance surveillance among children with sickle-cell anemia receiving malaria chemoprevention.

What to keep in mind

The analysis was limited to Ugandan participants, and bacterial infections were assessed through blood cultures obtained during febrile episodes; the abstract does not report a direct comparison of infection incidence between DP and SP groups.

Source

Published in PLoS One. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Pediatrics

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.