Metal Hypersensitivity Reactions Following Spinal Implants: A Systematic Review.

JBJS RevOct 19, 2026 (epub)

Joseph Abbo, Jacob Thomas, Christian Stipho et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review examined clinical presentation, diagnostic approaches, and outcomes of metal hypersensitivity after spinal implant surgery in adults. Fifteen studies reported 19 patients; presentations included persistent pain and, in 8 patients (42%), dermatologic manifestations. Testing confirmed hypersensitivity in 11 patients (58%), while the remainder were diagnosed clinically. Symptoms began from immediately after surgery to 15 years later. Eighteen patients underwent implant removal or revision, with clinical improvement reported in 14 of 16 patients with available outcomes (88%). The evidence was Therapeutic Level V and outcomes were reported narratively.

Key findings

  • The review included 15 studies and 19 patients with suspected or confirmed metal hypersensitivity after spinal implant surgery.
  • Dermatologic manifestations occurred in 8 patients (42%); testing confirmed hypersensitivity in 11 patients (58%).
  • Symptom onset ranged from immediately postoperatively to 15 years after implantation.
  • After removal or revision, clinical improvement was reported in 14 of 16 patients with reported outcomes (88%).

Why it matters

Metal hypersensitivity can resemble infection or mechanical complications, and symptoms may arise long after implantation. Awareness of this possibility may inform evaluation when more common explanations have been excluded. The review also shows that reported improvement after hardware removal is based on a very small, case-based literature rather than comparative evidence or validated outcome measures.

What to keep in mind

Evidence comprised 15 studies and 19 patients, largely from case reports and short case series. Outcomes were reported narratively rather than with validated measures, and the review provides no comparative evidence.

Source

Published in JBJS Rev. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Orthopedic Surgery

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.