Association of continuous glucose monitoring metrics with cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in type 2 diabetes: Data from the GRADE-CGM substudy.

J Diabetes ComplicationsOct 19, 2026 (epub)

Mengyao Tang, David M Nathan, Deborah J Wexler et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This analysis of the GRADE-CGM substudy examined whether blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics were associated with cardiovascular events or death and kidney function decline in 1,363 people with type 2 diabetes. Over a median 2.3 years, 74 cardiovascular events or deaths occurred. GMI, HbA1c, and time in range (TIR) were each associated with the cardiovascular/death composite: adjusted hazard ratios were 1.44 per 1% higher GMI, 1.37 per 1% higher HbA1c, and 0.73 per 20% higher TIR. GMI and HbA1c, but not TIR, were associated with eGFR decline.

Key findings

  • Per 1% higher GMI, the adjusted hazard ratio for cardiovascular events or death was 1.44 [1.21-1.71].
  • Per 1% higher HbA1c, the adjusted hazard ratio for cardiovascular events or death was 1.37 [1.16-1.61].
  • Per 20% higher TIR, the adjusted hazard ratio for cardiovascular events or death was 0.73 [0.61-0.87].
  • Higher GMI and HbA1c were associated with faster eGFR decline; TIR was not significantly associated with eGFR slope.

Why it matters

The findings suggest that CGM-derived GMI and TIR capture information associated with cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes, while GMI and HbA1c showed similar associations with both cardiovascular and kidney outcomes. The distinction between TIR’s cardiovascular association and its lack of a significant eGFR-slope association is relevant when interpreting CGM metrics across different outcomes.

What to keep in mind

The analysis had a median follow-up of 2.3 years and 74 cardiovascular events or deaths. Associations were attenuated after mutual adjustment of CGM metrics and HbA1c.

Source

Published in J Diabetes Complications. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Endocrinology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.