The Improvement in the Clinical Management of Patients Undergoing Palliative Care After Training the Primary Care Team by a Specialized Team: A Systematic Review.
Aila Davis Fanstone Pina Vieira, Deise Aparecida de A P Oliveira, Tamyris M F Sudré et al.
✦ AI-curated · Sources linked
In 30 seconds
This systematic review assessed whether palliative care training for healthcare professionals in primary care improves symptom assessment and clinical management. Eight studies with varied designs were included. The review found that training generally improved professionals’ knowledge and confidence, but evidence was not robust that it sustainably improved patient clinical outcomes. The included evidence also described a predominantly generalist model: 95% of care was provided by generalists, while 53% of patients had no identifiable palliative care in the last year of life. The authors concluded that education alone is insufficient without broader system support.
Key findings
- Across the included studies, training improved primary care professionals’ knowledge and confidence, but sustained improvement in patient clinical outcomes was not established.
- Generalists provided 95% of palliative care, and 53% of patients had no identifiable palliative care in the last year of life.
- Specialists were virtually absent in rural areas, where family doctors were responsible for nearly all palliative care.
Why it matters
The review highlights a gap between workforce education and the conditions needed to deliver effective palliative care. Training may strengthen clinicians’ knowledge and confidence, but limited clinical time, inadequate remuneration, weak specialist integration, and insufficient infrastructure can constrain its effect on patient care. These findings frame palliative care capacity as both an educational and health-system issue.
What to keep in mind
The eight included studies had varied designs, and the review found no robust evidence of sustained improvement in patient clinical outcomes.