Home-based nurse-led self-management support for heart failure: a randomized controlled trial.

Prim Health Care Res DevOct 28, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchCardiology

Hakan Çelik, Betül Özen

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This parallel-group randomized controlled trial assessed a 12-week, nurse-led home programme of tailored self-management support and follow-up for adults aged 40–75 years with NYHA class I–III heart failure and ejection fraction >30% who could not access centre-based rehabilitation. The intervention involved home visits and telephone follow-up; controls received usual care. At 12 weeks, self-care scores favoured the intervention group (17.78 ± 2.93 vs 40.00 ± 6.49). Quality of life, self-efficacy, and 6-minute walk distance also favoured the programme, which the authors considered a potential way to support continuity of care.

Key findings

  • At 12 weeks, self-care scores were 17.78 ± 2.93 in the intervention group versus 40.00 ± 6.49 with usual care.
  • Quality of life, self-efficacy, and 6-minute walk distance also favoured the home-based programme.
  • The abstract reports significant improvement in NYHA class and changes in some exploratory measures, including ejection fraction and body-fluid values.

Why it matters

Heart failure requires ongoing education and symptom monitoring, yet structured centre-based rehabilitation may not be accessible to everyone. This trial suggests that nurse-led home visits and telephone follow-up can support self-care and may help maintain support after specialist assessment. The findings are relevant to service models seeking to extend self-management support beyond specialist settings, while remaining specific to the population and programme studied.

What to keep in mind

The trial was small, with 32 participants in the intervention group and 31 in usual care, and outcomes were assessed at 12 weeks; longer-term effects are not reported in the abstract.

Source

Published in Prim Health Care Res Dev. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Cardiology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.