Mucus Plugging Across Multiple Chronic Respiratory Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

LungNov 6, 2026 (epub)
Clinical ResearchPulmonologyRadiology (Diagnostic)Open access

Dongru Du, Suli Liu, Yin Zhang et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed mucus-plug prevalence, clinical characteristics and outcomes across chronic respiratory diseases, including asthma, COPD and cystic fibrosis. Across 33 studies, pooled prevalence was 63% (95%CI 52%, 74%) in asthma, 47% (95% CI 38%, 55%) in COPD and 63% (95% CI 46%, 81%) in cystic fibrosis. Mucus plugging was associated with disease-specific clinical features and, in COPD, with higher risks of acute exacerbation and mortality, prolonged hospital stays and greater hospitalization costs. The findings identify mucus plugging as a common feature associated with clinically relevant outcomes, but do not establish causality.

Key findings

  • Pooled mucus-plug prevalence was 63% (95%CI 52%, 74%) in asthma, 47% (95% CI 38%, 55%) in COPD and 63% (95% CI 46%, 81%) in cystic fibrosis.
  • In asthma, mucus plugging was associated with higher eosinophil counts and FeNO, and lower FEV₁% and FEV₁/FVC.
  • In COPD, mucus plugging was associated with older age and lower BMI, FEV₁%, FVC% and FEV₁/FVC (all p < 0.05).
  • In COPD, mucus plugging was associated with higher risk of acute exacerbation and mortality, prolonged hospital stays and increased hospitalization costs.

Why it matters

Mucus plugging was common across the diseases reviewed and was associated with lung-function and inflammatory features, as well as adverse outcomes in COPD. Recognising these associations may help frame mucus plugging as a clinically relevant feature for research into disease assessment and prognosis. The review supports further investigation, while its findings do not show that mucus plugging causes these outcomes or that targeting it improves them.

What to keep in mind

The review reports heterogeneity across studies, with several clinical variables contributing to it in asthma and COPD. The abstract does not provide pooled effect estimates for the reported outcome associations.

Source

Published in Lung. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Pulmonology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.