Effects of intradermal lymphocyte therapy in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial investigating purinergic signaling, inflammation, and cellular energy status.

Mol Biol RepNov 6, 2026 (epub)

Ozkan Yildirim, Habibe Gundogdu, Danial Abbas-Kabiri et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial examined low-dose intradermal lymphocyte therapy (ILT) in 100 patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), comparing 50 treated patients with 50 receiving routine treatment; 30 women with successful pregnancy histories served as controls. Pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly higher with ILT than routine treatment (p < 0.001). Among patients with successful pregnancy, ILT was also associated with pre- to post-treatment changes in measured cytokines, ATP/AMP ratio, and CD39⁺CD73⁺ cell frequency. The analysis does not establish that these immunometabolic changes mediated the clinical outcomes.

Key findings

  • Pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly higher in the ILT group than in the routine-treatment group (p < 0.001).
  • In patients with successful pregnancy, ILT recipients showed significant pre- to post-treatment changes across all four measured cytokines.
  • Successful-pregnancy patients receiving ILT also had significant changes in ATP/AMP ratio and CD39⁺CD73⁺ cell frequency.

Why it matters

The findings connect a clinical outcome signal with changes in inflammatory markers, purinergic signaling, and cellular energy status in RPL. These measures may help frame further investigation of how ILT relates to pregnancy outcomes, but the reported associations do not show that the biomarker changes explain or cause the apparent clinical benefit.

What to keep in mind

Formal mediation cannot be inferred from this secondary analysis. The abstract reports no effect sizes for pregnancy or live birth rates, limiting assessment of the magnitude of the clinical difference.

Source

Published in Mol Biol Rep. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.