Mepolizumab effectiveness for patients with severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Italy (MEPOREAL): a real-life, multicentre, phase 4 trial.

Lancet Respir MedAug 18, 2026 (epub)

Eugenio De Corso, Giancarlo Ottaviano, Veronica Seccia et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

MEPOREAL was a real-life, multicentre, ambispective phase 4 study of mepolizumab in patients with severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps at 25 Italian referral clinics. Among 621 patients starting mepolizumab 100 mg every 4 weeks, nasal polyp and SNOT-22 scores decreased significantly from baseline by 12 months (p<0·0001), with improvements in major symptoms and olfaction. Disease control was reached by 206 (42%) of 519 patients; 104 (20%) of 519 were on the way to remission. Adverse events occurred in 29 (5%) of 621 patients.

Key findings

  • At 12 months, median nasal polyp and SNOT-22 scores had decreased significantly from baseline (p<0·0001).
  • Disease control was reached by 206 (42%) of 519 patients at 12 months.
  • At 12 months, 104 (20%) of 519 patients met the study definition of being on the way to remission.
  • Adverse events occurred in 29 (5%) of 621 patients; grade 1 events were most common.

Why it matters

The findings provide multicentre real-life evidence that mepolizumab can improve symptoms, olfaction, and endoscopic disease measures over the first year in severe, uncontrolled CRSwNP. However, control and progression towards remission were not achieved by most patients at 12 months, and a substantial proportion of assessed patients remained anosmic, underscoring the variability of response.

What to keep in mind

The report covers only the first 12 months, and the ambispective real-life design does not establish comparative efficacy. Long-term prospective studies are needed to clarify control and remission beyond this period.

Source

Published in Lancet Respir Med. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Otolaryngology (ENT)

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.