Factors affecting hand hygiene adherence among critical care healthcare workers: A systematic review.

J Infect Public HealthSep 17, 2026 (epub)

Serena Brunone, Benedetta Dellisanti, Valerio Capitani et al.

✦ AI-curated · Sources linked

In 30 seconds

This PRISMA-guided systematic review examined factors associated with hand hygiene adherence among healthcare workers in intensive care units and emergency departments. It included 30 studies published between 1994 and 2024, mostly quantitative, with study sample sizes ranging from 25 to 600 workers. The review identified structural and organizational obstacles—including limited supplies, time pressure, poor sink placement, high workload, and overcrowding—as prominent barriers. Skin irritation, glove use, and coworkers’ attitudes were also associated with lower adherence. The authors highlight education and organizational, logistical, and architectural support as relevant responses to persistent barriers.

Key findings

  • The review included 30 studies published between 1994 and 2024, with sample sizes ranging from 25 to 600 healthcare workers.
  • Limited materials, time constraints, suboptimal sink placement, high workload, and overcrowding were identified as structural or organizational barriers.
  • Skin irritation, glove use, and coworkers’ attitudes were also associated with reduced hand hygiene compliance.

Why it matters

Hand hygiene adherence in critical care settings is shaped not only by individual behaviour but also by the working environment. Recognising practical barriers such as supply access, workload, and sink placement can help frame improvement efforts around the conditions in which care is delivered, alongside ongoing education.

What to keep in mind

The review included studies with varied sample sizes and was mostly based on quantitative studies; the abstract does not report pooled effect estimates.

Source

Published in J Infect Public Health. This summary was written by xxcode from the publication's abstract and metadata. It is not peer reviewed and is not a substitute for the original article. For clinical decisions, review the original publication.

ShareTelegramLinkedIn

AI-generated summaries may contain errors or omissions. Verify clinically important information with the original publication.

More in Infectious Diseases

Want this personalized?

Stop searching the literature. Choose what you follow and xxcode will build your personalized medical digest.

  • Your specialties
  • Your filters and thresholds
  • Clinical Research + Case Reports, tuned separately
  • Automatic weekly delivery
  • Audio and text

Prefer listening? Personalized audio digests are available with Pro.

Stay updated for free

Get the 3 most interesting publications in one specialty each week.

Weekly email. Unsubscribe anytime.